|
Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research
www.snrs.org
Issue
3, Vol. 4
Coping Strategies Among African American Women with Breast Cancer Phyllis D. Henderson, Ph.D., APRN, BC1;
Joshua Fogel, Ph.D.2-6; Quannetta T. Edwards, DNSc, APRN, BC7 1Johns Hopkins University, School of Nursing; 2Johns
Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, 3Department
of Mental Health; 4Department of Biostatistics, 5School
of Medicine, 6Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences; 7George Mason University College of
Nursing and Health Science, Nurse Practitioner Program Coordinator at Fairfax,
VA.
ABSTRACTAlthough coping strategies have proven vital in
assisting women to adapt to a diagnosis of breast cancer, few researchers have
focused on coping strategies used by African American women with breast cancer.
The objectives of this study were to determine the coping strategies used by
African American women with breast cancer and to explore sociodemographic
variables such as age, income, education, marital status, and length of time
since diagnosis on coping strategies among African American women with breast
cancer. A cross-sectional design was used to study relationships among these
variables. The sample consisted of 86 African American women with a diagnosis
of breast cancer living in the southeastern United States. Participants were
surveyed with a demographic data sheet and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire
(WCQ). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and multiple linear
regression analyses. Results indicated that positive reappraisal and seeking
social support are the most commonly used coping strategies among African
American women with breast cancer. No significant relationships were found
among sociodemographic variables and coping strategies among African American
women. Also, a comparison of our mean coping strategy scores among African
American women with breast cancer are higher than the mean coping strategy
scores from a previous study of mostly Caucasian women with breast cancer.
Further research is needed to explore coping strategies of positive reappraisal
and seeking social support as these may be important factors in how African
American women survive breast cancer. Key words: African American, women, breast cancer,
coping, psychological Introduction
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths among African American women.1,2 In 2003, approximately 20,000 new cases of breast cancer will occur in African American women in the United States, and nearly 5,700 African American women will die from breast cancer.1 In addition, African American women have a lower survival rate from breast cancer than Caucasian women.1,3 The 5-year survival rate for breast cancer among African American women is 73% when compared to a survival rate of 88% among Caucasian women.1 Lack of education, lower socioeconomic status, inadequate medical insurance, underutilization of mammography, higher stage at cancer diagnosis, and limited access to care are some reported reasons for the racial differences in breast cancer survival.1,3 African American women and Caucasian women cope differently with breast cancer which may also help to explain their differences in breast cancer survival.4 Recently, researchers have determined that coping strategies used by women with breast cancer are a vital component for adjustment to their disease.4-7 Although studied among Caucasian women, coping strategies for African American women have not been well defined in the majority of illnesses, including breast cancer.8-10 Exploration of coping strategies used by African American women, and the possibility of how certain sociodemographic variables might relate to coping strategies among African American women with breast cancer, is the focus of this study. Literature Review Theoretical Framework. This study is guided by the Roy Adaptation Model.11 In this model, individuals are viewed as adaptive systems that are capable of responding to their changing environment. The environment is categorized into focal, contextual, and residual stimuli. The focal stimulus is what immediately confronts the individual, which in this study was the diagnosis of breast cancer. Contextual stimuli are factors that contribute to the focal stimulus. In this study, we conceptualized these factors to be intervening variables that included relevant demographic data of age, marital status, educational level, income, and length of time since diagnosis. These intervening variables are discussed in other studies of individuals with breast cancer.12-15 Residual stimuli are unknown environmental factors that affect the individual’s adaptive system. In this study, we allowed for the possibility of unknown residual stimuli, although we could not quantify or measure them. According to Fawcett,16 the Roy Adaptation Model11 is related to the theory of Lazarus, Averill, and Opton,17 which describes coping mechanisms as innate or acquired methods that individuals use to respond to internal and/or external changes. Roy and Andrews11 state that individuals respond to changes in environmental stimuli through regulator and cognator coping subsystems. The regulator subsystem is a coping process in which an individual automatically responds to environmental stimuli through neural, chemical, and endocrine systems. The cognator coping subsystem allows an individual to respond and adapt to the environmental stimuli through four cognitive-emotive channels: 1) perceptual and information processing, 2) learning, 3) judgment, and 4) emotion. Perceptual information processing involves activities of selective attention, coding, and memory. Learning involves imitation, reinforcement, and insight. Judgment involves decision-making and problem solving. Emotions refer to psychological defenses used to make affective appraisals and attachments. Also, the regulator and cognator coping subsystems occur in four adaptive modes: 1) physiological, 2) self-concept, 3) role function, and 4) interdependence.11 Roy and Andrews11
state that the goal of nursing care is to promote health among individuals by
enhancing their coping mechanisms. As few researchers focus on coping
strategies used by African American women, this study fills a gap in nursing
knowledge by focusing on the cognator coping mechanisms of African American
women with breast cancer. African American women as well as other racial groups
may be viewed as adaptive systems that are capable of responding to their
changing environmental stimuli through cognitive coping mechanisms that promote
their adaptation to a diagnosis of breast cancer. In this study we focused on
African American women. Breast Cancer, Coping Strategies, and Adaptation. Due to the physical and psychological impact of breast cancer, coping strategies are essential for adaptation.4-7 Various strategies exist to assist women in coping with breast cancer.13,18 Little is known about the psychological continuum within which African American women live with an illness such as breast cancer, and what enhances possible long-term survival.19-20 It is important to recognize that African American women filter information through a cultural context. These factors may influence their perception of breast cancer and possibly influence their survival rates.19-22 Prayer and spirituality are common coping approaches for
African American women experiencing illness.19-23 Studies
show that both African American women and Caucasian women frequently use positive
reappraisal, social support,
and “planful problem solving” to cope with breast cancer.8,10,24 Folkman
and Lazarus25 coined
the term "planful problem solving"
to mean that an individual utilizes an analytic approach to solve a problem or
stressful situation. Northouse et al.26
found that optimism was related to a high quality of life among African
American women with breast cancer; however, no statistically significant
relationships were found between demographic variables and quality of life
among these women. A possible limitation of their study is that coping was not
measured as a mediator between the
antecedent demographic variables and the outcome variable, quality of life. Support and information play significant roles in women’s
adjustment to breast cancer.27-29
Studies of Caucasian women who do not receive adequate information or
social support show that they tend to experience more difficulty adjusting to
breast cancer.28-29 African
American women report receiving insufficient information from their health care
providers regarding how to cope with their breast cancer.9,30 Furthermore, African American women state that some
breast cancer support groups lack cultural sensitivity and do not provide them
with the information and emotional support they need to cope with breast
cancer.9,31 These
experiences of African American women with traditional health care services may
place them at risk for inadequate adjustment to their breast cancer. Contextual variables and coping with breast cancer. A few studies examine the relationship of sociodemographic variables among women coping with breast cancer; however, most of these studies include only a small percentage of African American women.7,14,32 Schnoll, Knowles, and Harlow14 studied a sample of mixed gender Caucasian cancer survivors and found that demographic variables were associated with positive adaptation. Those who were married, had high income and education levels, and used lower levels of avoidant coping had better adjustment, while length of diagnosis was not related to adjustment. Most of the participants were breast cancer survivors (60%). In another study of predominantly Caucasian breast cancer survivors (91.6%), those with lower education were more likely to use confrontive coping.15 Age, education, uncertainty, stress appraisal, or hope did not explain a significant amount of variance in any of their coping strategies. The relative mean scores (RMS) on the Ways of Coping Questionnaire indicated that their most commonly used coping strategies were planful problem solving (RMS = 0.18) and positive reappraisal (RMS = 0.17). Women with a lower educational background were more likely to use the confrontive coping strategy. Many research studies utilize qualitative methodologies to explore the breast cancer experience of African American women.30-31,33 However, to our knowledge only a few published studies use quantitative methodology to explore relationships between demographic variables and coping strategies used by African American women; these studies consist of combined samples of women from different ethnic/racial groups.4,8,10,34 Additionally, there are inconsistencies in the literature regarding demographic variables that may predict coping strategies used by women with breast cancer.8,14,34 Therefore, the aims of this study were to specifically focus on coping strategies used by African American women with breast cancer and to identify relationships among sociodemographic variables and coping strategies used by African American women with breast cancer. Based on our literature review, we hypothesized that the coping strategies of positive reappraisal, seeking social support, and planful problem solving would be related to sociodemographic variables. Methods
Sample/Setting. A cross-sectional design and a convenience sampling technique were used to recruit participants for this study. Eligibility criteria were as follows: 1) African American women who self-reported a confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer, 2) no metastatic disease, 3) resident of the southeastern United States, and 4) able to provide verbal and written consent to participate in the study. Procedures.
Flyers were given to breast cancer support group facilitators, African American
church leaders, and nurses and physicians at oncology clinics to distribute to
potential participants. Breast cancer support group facilitators and ministers
at churches allowed the first author to make verbal announcements about the
study. African American women who were interested in participating in the study
contacted the researcher via telephone. Written consent was obtained from each
participant. Breast cancer support group facilitators allotted time for African
American women to complete questionnaires if they wanted to participate in the
study. Some women asked to have their surveys mailed and agreed to return them
to the researcher (n = 20) while the others completed their surveys on site
(n=66). Most participants (62%) were recruited from African American breast
cancer support groups while the rest were not (38%). Approval to conduct this
study was obtained from the Hampton University Institutional Review Board. Instrumentation. Data were collected utilizing a background data sheet (BDS) and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ) developed by Folkman and Lazarus.25 The BDS, developed by the lead author, was used to obtain demographic data that pertained to the contextual stimuli such as age, marital status, income, educational level, and length of time since diagnosis. The WCQ served as a measure for cognator coping mechanisms utilized by African American women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Based on a review of the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from 1996 to 2002,35 the WCQ has been widely used in nursing studies guided by the Roy Adaptation Model.11 The WCQ is a 66-item, 4-point Likert-type instrument that assesses cognitive and behavioral coping strategies with eight subscales.25 Participants are asked to respond to each item by indicating the frequency with which each strategy was used with 0 indicating “not used,” 1 indicating “used somewhat,” 2 indicating “used quite a bit,” and 3 indicating “used a great deal.” Table 1 depicts the eight subscales and what they represent. According to Folkman and Lazarus25 Cronbach alpha scores in the original study ranged from .61 to .79; in this study they ranged from .51 to .70 (see Table 1). Table 1. Description
of Folkman and Lazarus25 Ways of Coping Questionnaire Subscales
and
Cronbach α scores for the Original Sample and Current Sample |
|
Coping
Subscale |
Description
of Coping Subscale |
Cronbach
α Original Sample |
Cronbach
α Current
Sample |
|
Confrontive
Coping |
aggressive
efforts used to alter a situation; describes the individual as using some
degree of hostility and risk-taking behavior |
.70 |
.52 |
|
Distancing |
detachment
or disengagement; a strategy to minimize the significance of the situation |
.61 |
.51 |
|
Self-controlling |
efforts that are used by
individuals to regulate their feelings and actions |
.70 |
.43 |
|
Seeking social support |
efforts used to obtain
informational, tangible, and/or emotional support |
.76 |
.70 |
|
Accepting responsibility |
recognizes one’s role in solving
a problem |
.66 |
.66 |
|
Escape-avoidance |
wishful thinking and behavioral
efforts to avoid confronting a problem or stressful situation |
.72 |
.59 |
|
Planful problem solving |
problem-focused efforts to alter
the situation, including an analytic approach to problem solving |
.68 |
.63 |
|
Positive reappraisal |
a religious dimension, includes
giving positive meaning to a situation by focusing on one’s personal growth |
.79 |
.70 |
|
Statistical Analysis. Continuous variables included age and length of time since diagnosis. Categorical variables included marital status, income status and education level. Raw scores and relative scores were calculated for the WCQ as described in the WCQ manual.25 Raw scores represent the sum of the items divided by the number of items in that subscale. Relative scores represent each raw score divided by the total of all the raw scores for the eight subscales. Relative scores are expressed as a proportion for each type of coping subscale. High relative and raw scores indicate that a person frequently uses the behaviors described by that coping subscale. Next, multiple regression analyses were done with each coping subscale being regressed onto the sociodemographic variables of age, length of time since diagnosis, marital status, income, and educational level. All categorical data were dummy coded. Relative scores were used to conduct multiple regression analyses where we separately regressed each coping subscale onto the sociodemographic variables. All of these data were analyzed utilizing the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software program (SPSS, 2002) Version 11.0.36 Finally, to aid in the interpretation of our data, we chose to compare our raw scores obtained from each coping subscale in this study to those from a previous study.8This study was the only one in the literature that provided mean and SD scores for the WCQ subscales; however, these data combined Caucasian women and African American women with breast cancer. The sample size, mean, and SD for that study and our study were used to perform t-tests for independent samples. STATA Statistical Software,37 Version 7.0 was used for these analyses. We approached the
missing data using statistical procedure of mean imputation. No participant had
a large number of items missing from the WCQ. For those who inadvertently
omitted items from the WCQ, which did not include more than two responses per
questionnaire, we imputed the mean scores for each item on the WCQ. For
sociodemographic data missing on the BDS, we did not impute any values; these
participants were not included in the regression analysis, as is the default in
SPSS. Power Analysis. Power analyses were conducted a-priori for sample size estimation. These analyses were conducted with G*POWER38,39 with each subscale coping score as the outcome measure. The a-priori power analysis for the multiple linear regression with nine predictors (i.e., all the sociodemographic variables in their dummy coded form) showed that 54 participants (total N) were necessary to detect a large effect (f2 = .35; Cohen40) with a = .05 and power = .80. Results
Table 2 depicts the summary demographic characteristics of the participants in this study. Ages ranged from 35 to 76 years old. Participant’s length of time since the diagnosis of breast cancer ranged from 2 months to 21 years. The majority of the participants were married (45.3%). Educational levels ranged from less than high school to doctor of philosophy degree. The majority of participants had at least a high school degree. The majority of participants’ annual incomes were in the category that ranged from $30,000 per year to $59,999 per year. Also, the most common type of surgery reported by participants included simple mastectomy (16.3%), radical mastectomy (32.6%), and lumpectomy (46.5%). Participants received various types of breast cancer treatment such as radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. |
Table
2. Demographic Characteristics
of African American Women with Breast Cancer (N = 86)
|
||
|
Variable |
Meana or Frequenciesb |
SDa or Percentagesb |
|
Age (years)a |
52.29 |
9.42 |
|
Length of time since diagnosis (months)a |
51.92 |
56.61 |
|
Marital Statusb Single Married Previously Married |
16 39 31 |
18.60 45.34 36.04 |
Educational Statusb
High School or Less Associates Degree Bachelor’s Degree Master’s Degree or higher Missing |
30  9 21 22  4 |
34.88 10.46 24.41 25.58 4.65 |
|
Annual Incomeb <$30,000 $30,000 - $59,999 $60,000 or greater Missing |
18 42 21  5 |
20.93 48.83 24.41 5.81 |
|
Note: aMeans and SD are for continuous
variables (age and length of time since diagnosis)
|
||
|
Based on relative scores of the WCQ, the most frequently used coping strategies were positive reappraisal and social support, followed by planful problem solving. As shown in Table 3, the other coping strategies were not as common. Accepting responsibility was the least frequently used coping strategy among participants. |
|
Table 3. Relative
Score Coping Strategy Subscales Among African American Women with Breast
Cancer (N = 86) |
||
|
Coping Strategy |
Mean |
SD |
|
Positive
Reappraisal |
0.24 |
0.06 |
|
Seeking
Social Support |
0.20 |
0.06 |
|
Planful
Problem Solving |
0.15 |
0.05 |
|
Self-Controlling |
0.12 |
0.04 |
|
Distancing |
0.10 |
0.05 |
|
Escape-avoidance |
0.07 |
0.04 |
|
Confrontive
Coping |
0.07 |
0.04 |
|
Accepting
Responsibility |
0.03 |
0.04 |
|
Note: Mean and SD relative scores from the Ways of Coping
Questionnaire25 |
||
|
|
||
|
As shown in Table 4, multiple regression analyses indicated that none of the variables of age, marital status, education, income, or length of time since diagnosis predicted any of the eight types of coping strategies (our hypotheses and also exploratory analyses for the others) among African American women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Also, comparison of our summary scores to those in the literature from a mostly Caucasian sample of women with breast cancer with t-tests showed that there were significant differences between African American and Caucasian women where African American women used more positive reappraisal, seeking social support, planful problem solving, escape-avoidance, and confrontive coping strategies (see Table 5). |
|
Table 4. Multiple Linear Regression Models for Coping Strategy Subscales
Regressed on Sociodemographic Factors among African American Women with
Breast Cancer |
||
|
Coping Strategy |
Model F Statistic |
Model p-value |
|
Positive
Reappraisal |
0.88 |
.54 |
|
Seeking
Social Support |
0.65 |
.75 |
|
Planful
Problem Solving |
0.81 |
.61 |
|
Self-Controlling |
0.88 |
.55 |
|
Distancing |
1.34 |
.23 |
|
Escape-avoidance |
0.47 |
.89 |
|
Confrontive
Coping |
0.43 |
.91 |
|
Accepting
Responsibility |
1.14 |
.35 |
|
Note: Coping strategies are those obtained from
the WCQ25 using the
relative scoring method N = 79
due to missing sociodemographic data. |
||
Table
5. Ways of Coping Questionnaire
Comparisons Between African American Women and a Mixed Racial Sample of
Mostly Caucasian Women with Breast Cancer |
|||||
|
Coping Strategy |
Mean (SD)a |
Mean (SD)b |
t statistic |
p-value |
95% CIc |
|
Positive
Reappraisal |
1.45 (.74) |
2.41 (.52) |
-10.11 |
<.001 |
-1.15, -0.77 |
|
Seeking
Social Support |
1.70 (.75) |
2.07 (.68) |
-3.51 |
< .001 |
-0.58, -0.16 |
|
Planful
Problem Solving |
1.31 (.63) |
1.57 (.61) |
-2.86 |
< .01 |
-0.44, -0.08 |
|
Self-Controlling |
1.14 (.61) |
1.29 (.51) |
-1.81 |
> .05 |
-0.31, 0.01 |
|
Distancing |
1.05 (.68) |
1.06 (.51) |
-0.11 |
> .05 |
-0.19, 0.17 |
|
Escape-avoidance |
0.63 (.54) |
0.78 (.48) |
-1.995 |
< .05 |
-.0.30, -0.00 |
|
Confrontive
Coping |
0.53 (.42) |
0.78 (.46) |
-3.89 |
< .001 |
-0.38, -0.12 |